Hello
For those wondering, the lilac can be a metaphor (the lilac was her devotion)
or it can be metonymous with the deluge of celebratory blooms
consecrating a performance ground; either way, what one knows is fact,
is its frame: particularly I grasp the stalk of the lilac, which is dry pine
in texture; next, the blossoms do not collect on the top, but instead sprout like arms from the central line; she looks like a tattered coat on a stick when in full regalia. And that, in itself, is a metaphor for the lilac and the writer, because it is the form we all aspire to; it is so dynamic. A rose is a rose is a rose only when it stands up. A lilac is a patchwork of petals, some groaning in confusion and dry madness, others bombastically tip the balance. But whatever the appearance is, you can be assured that each flower creates its own work in due to the attachment to the central process of the plant.
I like that "groaning in confusion"
or it can be metonymous with the deluge of celebratory blooms
consecrating a performance ground; either way, what one knows is fact,
is its frame: particularly I grasp the stalk of the lilac, which is dry pine
in texture; next, the blossoms do not collect on the top, but instead sprout like arms from the central line; she looks like a tattered coat on a stick when in full regalia. And that, in itself, is a metaphor for the lilac and the writer, because it is the form we all aspire to; it is so dynamic. A rose is a rose is a rose only when it stands up. A lilac is a patchwork of petals, some groaning in confusion and dry madness, others bombastically tip the balance. But whatever the appearance is, you can be assured that each flower creates its own work in due to the attachment to the central process of the plant.
I like that "groaning in confusion"

